Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Chinchilla Ranch, Inc. v. O'CONNELL

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1952PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Relator, the Chinchilla Ranch, Inc., contends that Judge Gehl’s opinion filed May 13, 1949, which concluded with the sentence, “Defendant’s motion must be granted,” constituted an order within the provisions of sec. 270.53 (2), Stats., which provides:

“Every direction of a court or judge made or entered in writing and not included in a judgment is denominated an order.”

We cannot agree with such contention. It seems plain from reading Judge Gehl’s opinion in which he recites the contentions of the parties, and cites legal authorities on the question of permitting the defendant to defend the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Day v. BuckinghamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Barrock v. BarrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wessling v. HiebWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kayser v. HartnettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Bobroff v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rist v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Oldenburg v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. CCC v. District Court for Fourth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Glassner v. Medical Realty, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API