Will of Robinson v. Robinson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
A determination of the questions involved here requires consideration of the duties of an executor and the nature of an action for devastavit. In Coolidge v. Rueth, 209 Wis. 458, 245 N. W. 186, we gave consideration to the duties of an administrator under somewhat analogous conditions. However, the duties imposed by statute upon an administrator differ somewhat from those imposed upon an executor.
Sec. 310.13, Stats., provides that, when any will shall be admitted to probate, the court shall grant letters testamentary and that—
“such estate, after the payment of the just debts and expenses of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Spaulding v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Dillon v. LinderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Estate of SipchenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Peninsular Lead & Color Works v. Union Oil & Paint Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Baker v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Niesen v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- John v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1956
- Estate of Onstad v. OnstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Richardson v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.