Gifford v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
In 1998 the City of Los Angeles, through the Los Angeles Police Department (Police Department), refused respondent Arthur S. Gifford’s application for a concealed firearm license. (Pen. Code, § 12050.) Gifford filed a petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085), alleging that the Police Department was obligated to give him the license pursuant to a stipulated judgment in earlier litigation, Lake v. City of Los Angeles (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 1996, No. PC008329). In response, the Police Department argued that the Lake judgment did not relieve Gifford of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Plaza Freeway Ltd. Partnership v. First Mountain BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Salute v. PitchessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Nichols v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mosby v. DevineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Peruta v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Charter Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Charter Communications Properties, LLC Paul G. Allen v. County of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Calguns Foundation v. Co. of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.