Salute v. Pitchess
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
Petitioners appeal from an order dismissing their petition for a writ of mandate, after a demurrer to that petition had been sustained. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the order.
Petitioners were and now are duly admitted attorneys-at-law and were duly licensed private investigators. As investigators they applied to respondent Sheriff of Los Angeles County for a permit to carry concealed weapons and their application was rejected. They sought relief in the trial court with the result above stated.
As duly licensed private investigators, petitioners are…
2Cited by13 opinions
- McCarthy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Nichols v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- San Jose Police Officers Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Gifford v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Erdelyi v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.