Carter Products, Inc., and Sullivan, Stauffer, Colwell & Bayles, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
Everyone knows that on TY all that glisters is not gold. On a black and white screen, white looks grey and blue looks white: the lily must be painted. Coffee looks like mud. Real ice cream melts much more quickly than that firm but fake sundae. The plain fact is, except by props and mock-ups 1 some objects cannot be shown on television as the viewer, in his mind’s eye, knows the essence of the objects.
The technical limitations of television, driving .product manufacturers to the substitution of a mock-up for the genuine article, if they wish to use what they may regard…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cinderella Career and Finishing Schools, Inc., Stephen Corporation, Vincent Melzac v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Chrysler Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mary Carter Paint Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.