Legal Opinion

Hornyak v. Brooks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1984No. 47019PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate an agreed judgment, which the court had entered approximately thirteen months earlier. The trial court had discretion to deny that motion without a further evidentiary hearing, so we affirm.

Plaintiff’s complaint sought $200,000 damages for personal injuries in a motor vehicle collision almost two years earlier between his car and defendant’s car. The trial court’s file contains no information about the nature of that collision or any claimed injuries, beyond minimal allegations in plaintiff’s complaint. Ten months after plaintiff…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bates & Springer, Inc. v. StallworthOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. East Ohio Gas Co. v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Society National Bank v. Val Halla Athletic Club & Recreation Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Fontain v. SandhuOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Newark Orthopedics, Inc. v. BrockOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. WFG Natl. Title Ins. Co. v. MeehanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Miami System Corp. v. Dry Cleaning Computer Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API