Legal Opinion

Newark Orthopedics, Inc. v. Brock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1994No. 93AP-807PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteside, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Thomas E. Brock, Jr., appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion for relief from judgment, and raises the following four assignments of error:

1. “A trial court abuses its discretion when it refuses to vacate a default judgment entered during a period in which the movant was an adjudicated incompetent and no guardian was appointed to represent or protect his interests.”

2. “The trial court abused its discretion in not granting defendant-appellant relief from the judgment of May 20, 1983, as that judgment was not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Atkinson v. Grumman Ohio Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Doddridge v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rite Rug Co., Inc. v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company v. Lola V. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Morgan Adhesives Co. v. Sonicor Instrument Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. UBS Real Estate Securities, Inc. v. TeagueOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Miller v. Susa Partnership, L.P., 07ap-702 (3-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API