Miami System Corp. v. Dry Cleaning Computer Systems, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant, Dry Cleaning Computer Systems, Inc., raises two assignments of error. In its first assignment of error appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting default judgment in favor of appellee, Miami System Corporation, d.b.a. Data Fold Forms. In its second assignment of error appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to set aside the default judgment. Because appellant’s first assignment of error is rendered moot by our disposition of its second assignment of error, we need not address appellant’s first assignment of error pursuant to App.R.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Plant Equipment, Inc. v. Nationwide Control Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Engelhart v. BluettOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Mueller v. HammannOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Everbank v. VanarnhemOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hoffman v. HoffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.