Legal Opinion
Heinfling v. Colapinto
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 22, 1996No. 96 Civ. 1757 (SAS)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants William Soltis (“Soltis”), The Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department (collectively the “LA County Defendants”), Mervyn H. Wolf (‘Wolf’), and Donald Zelinsky (“Zelinsky”) move, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction. The LA County Defendants also move to dismiss Plaintiffs state law claim for abuse of process as barred by the. statute of limitations, and to dismiss Plaintiffs §§ 1983 and 1985(3) claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). In addition, Defendants Wolf and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. Brickellbush, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Frooks v. Town of CortlandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Emerald Asset Advisors, LLC v. SchafferDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Gmurzynska v. HuttonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.