Legal Opinion

Bank of Commerce of Toledo v. Corliss

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1923No. Calendar 29,915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendants appealed from a decree of foreclosure of a contract for the purchase and sale ,of certain real estate and personal property in Clinton county. The decree as rendered fixed the amount due, ordered a sale of the property, determined the personal liability of the defendants for any deficiency, and awarded execution for its collection. It was modified in this court by changing the date after which sale might be had and providing that the circuit judge should make report to this court of the amount realized on the sale and the costs and expenses incident thereto. This court retained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chappee v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Kelly v. GauklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ransom v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McCrickett v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Howe v. LemonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodman v. RottMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API