Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Rott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1928No. Docket No. 41Published

1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.

On October 13, 1922, plaintiffs executed to defendant Mrs. A. Harris a warranty deed of two lots in Detroit, herein referred to as the Brandon street property. The instrument was recorded as a deed. By contemporaneous written instrument, the deed was declared to be a mortgage to secure the repayment of $3,000, evidenced by four promissory notes. The loan was usurious because a bonus of $600 was included in the sum to be repaid. The transaction was conducted on behalf of Mrs. Harris by Saul Meister, or, as found by the trial judge, the party in interest was Meister himself. On October 15,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of Commerce of Toledo v. CorlissMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API