Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Sutherland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Berrien. Motion for execution for deficiency on foreclosure. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The misapprehension in respect to the proper practice in this case has been such as to necessitate a reversal of the order which is appealed from.

In August, 1879, Ransom took decree against Sutherland and others in a foreclosure case. ’ The decree adjudged *491Sutherland to be personally liable upon the mortgage debt. A sale under the decree of all the land described therein was made October 8, 1879, and the commissioner reported a deficiency, after applying the purchase money on the decree and costs, of $583.61. December 30, 1880, complainant’s solicitors served on the solicitor who had '…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moore v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. McCrickett v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Jehle v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Haldane v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Wallace v. FieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API