Legal Opinion

United States v. Villanueva-Sotelo

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 15, 2008No. 07-3055PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1236Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

The federal “[aggravated identity theft” statute imposes two additional years of imprisonment on any person who during the commission of an enumerated felony “knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person.” 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l). The question before us is this: to obtain a conviction under section 1028A(a)(l), must the government prove the defendant knew the “means of identification” he “transfer[red],…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United States v. GodinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Bryan BurwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Zhen Zhou WuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API