Legal Opinion

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Boston Scientific Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 30, 1999No. Civ.A. 99-10244-PBSPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) brings this action 1 against defendant Boston Scientific Corporation (“BSC”) alleging that BSC unlawfully monopolized, or attempted to monopolize, the intravascular ultrasound (“IVUS”) catheter and console markets in the United States, in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and state law. An IVUS catheter is a flexible tube-like device used in conjunction with a console to obtain sonographic images of arteries. HP also seeks a declaratory judgment that it is no…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. CCBN. Com, Inc. v. THOMSON FINANACIAL, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
  3. Breiding v. Eversource EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. United States v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  5. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API