Legal Opinion
Breiding v. Eversource Energy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 11, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17-12274PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASPER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
A putative class of retail electricity consumers residing in New England (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have filed this lawsuit against Eversource Energy ("Eversource") and Avangrid, Inc. ("Avangrid") (collectively, "Defendants"), alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and various state consumer protection and antitrust laws. D. 33. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants restricted New England's supply of natural gas, a key component in the generation of over half the electricity in New England, and, as a result, caused New Englanders to pay…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Breiding v. Eversource EnergyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- PNE Energy Supply LLC v. Eversource EnergyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- PNE Energy Supply LLC v. Eversource EnergyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- United States of America, ex rel. Ian Dixon, Karl Quist, and Sara Stovall v. Sentara Health Plans f/k/a Optima Health Plan, Sentara Health f/k/a Sentara Healthcare, and Milliman, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2026
- YUEN v. IDEXX LABORATORIES INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024