Showe-Time Video Rentals, Inc. v. Douglas
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CROW, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether equity will enforce a covenant not to compete, in an agreement that either party can terminate at will, where the covenant restricts only one party, and the other party terminates the agreement, then seeks to enforce the covenant.
Appellant (“Showe-Time”) is engaged in the business of renting movie videocassettes to the general public. Showe-Time’s videocassettes are available at various outlets, referred to at trial as “branch facilities” and “pit stops.” Individuals can obtain “credit cards” from Showe-Time, and use them in renting…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Economy Grocery Stores Corp. v. McMenamyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Prentice v. RoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- McKnight v. Midwest Eye Institute of Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Superior Gearbox Co. v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Central Monitoring Service, Inc. v. ZakinskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Furniture Manufacturing Corp. v. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.