Legal Opinion
Prentice v. Rowe
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 2, 1959No. 7734PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Presiding Judge.
Defendant, W. E. Rowe, appeals from a decree enjoining him “from artificially inseminating cattle, either directly or indirectly, in McDonald County, Missouri for a period of two years from November 21, 1957.” About May 1948, Rowe (who theretofore had been a dairy farmer in McDonald County for fifteen years) began to work as an artificial inseminator of cattle — a calling frequently identified by the less discriminating and descriptive, but more dignified and distinguished, title of “technician.” For a time, Rowe “worked on a commission” for Harry Rollins, a “pioneer of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
- John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Barnhart v. RipkaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Grace v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- N.I.S. Corp. v. Hallahan (In re Hallahan)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Continental Research Corp. v. ScholzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- National Motor Club of Missouri, Inc. v. NoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.