Legal Opinion
Valentine v. Conrad
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 2006No. 2004-1619PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} The question presented in this appeal is whether Evid.R. 702(C) requires a scientifically valid connection between the opinion of an expert witness and the resources relied upon by the expert.
{¶ 2} David E. Valentine was employed by PPG Industries, Inc., from 1969 to 1997, and it is alleged that he was exposed to various toxic chemicals throughout his employment. In 1997, Mr. Valentine was diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme, a form of brain cancer. As a result of the cancer, Mr. Valentine died in May 1999.
{¶ 3} Mr. Valentine’s widow, Linda Valentine, appellant, filed a claim for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Raymond Rosen v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Miller v. Bike Athletic Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- State v. Grate (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. PlottOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Froman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. CaliseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.