Eaton v. Wilkins
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs’ third amended complaint having been sustained, and plaintiffs having refused to amend further, judgment was accordingly given in favor of defendants and from it plaintiffs take this appeal. The action was one for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real and personal property. The complaint contains allegations that on September 22, 1909, defendant W. H. Wilkins was the owner of a certain described tract of land in San Joaquin County, together with certain specified personal property situated thereon, and that on said day Wilkins executed and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Kegley v. KegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Rhode v. GallatSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- McMahon v. PlumbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.