Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Rutland & Burlington Railroad

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1851PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Bill in Chancery, the nature and object of ■which are sufficiently stated in the opinion which was delivered by

1Opinion of the Court

Bennett, Chancellor.

This is a bill preferred before the chancellor of the third judicial circuit, against the Rutland and Burlington Railroad Company and three of its directors, by a stock holder in the company; the object of which is to obtain an injunction against the defendants, restraining them from applying the funds of the corporation, or pledging its credit for the purpose of constructing a railroad from Burlington, in the county of Chittenden, to Swanton, in the county of Franklin.

It appears that the legislature of this state, at their session in 1843, granted a charter of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Foster v. President of the Essex BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  3. Livingston v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  4. Middlesex Turnpike Corp. v. LockeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  5. Middlesex Turnpike Corp. v. SwanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
  5. Tower Hill-Connellsville Coke Co. of West Virginia v. Piedmont Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API