Valluzzo v. Valluzzo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The ultimate facts amply support the judgment, and unless they are conclusions that could not legally or logically have been drawn from the facts found, the judgment must stand. We are satisfied that these conclusions were, both legally and logically, supported by the facts found. The plaintiff, in brief and argument, claims that on the facts found she was entitled to a divorce for intolerable cruelty, and that such a conclusion was logically necessary because the defendant would not permit her to keep the baby to which she was so deeply attached; and further, that such refusal justified her…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Friend v. FriendWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Rowell v. Stamford Street RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Saunders v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Fattibene v. FattibeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- England v. EnglandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.