Americhem Corp. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny defendant’s motion. 1
I
Plaintiff Americhem Corporation (“Ameri-chem”) blends, repackages, and sells industrial solvents, chemicals, and lubricants. From 1975 to 1980, Barrels, Inc., reconditioned containers for Americhem. In an action against Americhem and others, the Michigan Attorney General and the Director of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources claim that Barrels, Inc., is a site of environmental contamination.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
- Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Metlife Capital Corp. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Sicherman v. Diamoncut, Inc. (In Re Sol Bergman Estate Jewelers, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Guillermety v. Secretary of Education of United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Kleenit, Inc. v. Sentry InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Aero-Motive Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.