Legal Opinion
Century Indemnity Co. v. Aero-Motive Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 18, 2003No. 5:02-cv-00108PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Century Indemnity Company (“Century”) and One Beacon Insurance Company (“One Beacon”) filed this action seeking a declaration that they are not obligated to Defendants, Aero-Motive Company, Aero-Motive Manufacturing Company, William Becker, and Roger Becker (collectively “Aero” or “Defendants”), under certain insurance policies they allegedly issued and that they are not obligated to satisfy a consent judgment among Defendants. Subsequently, Continental Insurance (“Continental”) moved to intervene as a plaintiff in the case based upon claims by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Estee Lauder Inc. v. OneBeacon Insurance Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In Re Commercial Money Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Flanagan v. Altria Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005