Legal Opinion

Scontsas v. Citizens Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 7, 1972No. 6248PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

This case was here before trial on the question of discovery. 109 N.H. 386, 253 A.2d 831 (1969). It involves a claim under a valued policy insurance contract covering two paintings by Leeteg, one insured for $95,000 and the other for $55,000. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs after being instructed that in the event of a verdict for the plaintiffs the amount would be filled in by the court. Defendant’s exceptions were transferred by Keller, J-

The only issues submitted to the jury were whether or not the paintings were stolen and whether plaintiff husband who was an agent of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lakeman v. LaFranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
  2. McIsaac v. McMurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  3. Owen v. WestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  4. Scontsas v. Citizens Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. Dion v. Cheshire MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weinisch v. SawyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. Brown v. ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API