Legal Opinion

Dion v. Cheshire Mills

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1943No. 3410PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The question whether the issues should be consolidated was for the court, and no reason appears why his decision in that respect should be overruled. Genest v. Company, 75 N. H. 365. The question was raised at the hearing- on the motion whether the effect of the rulings made would not be to deprive the plaintiff of his constitutional right to trial by jury, and that question is before us.

Some confusion has arisen because of the fact that both law and equity take jurisdiction over issues of fraud. The plaintiff referred in argument to the phrase used by counsel in Hoitt v. Holcomb, 23 N. H.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baird v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. King v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keshishian v. CMC RadiologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Gilman v. LAKE SUNAPEE PROPERTIES, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  3. Scontsas v. Citizens InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Gilman v. LAKE SUNAPEE PROPERTIES, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. McPadden v. WalmartDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API