Legal Opinion

Scontsas v. Citizens Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 3, 1969No. 5860PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

This is an action in assumpsit to recover for the loss of two paintings, both by Leeteg, which were insured by the defendant.

The plaintiffs moved for discovery and at about the same time issued subpoenas to certain employees of the defendant to appear to give their depositions and to bring with them essentially the same documents which were requested in the motion for discovery. The Trial Court (Flynn, J.) granted the motion for discovery subject to defendant’s exception but limited it to documents dated before the loss, and on motion ol defendant stayed the taking of depositions pending…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. Johnston v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. Murray v. Developmental Services of Sullivan County, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Calderwood v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Nash Family Investment Properties v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API