Herzog v. Purdy
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order refusing a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts áre stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
On April 11, 1895, the parties entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to buy and defendant agreed to sell certain salt hides, calfskins, pelts, and tallow of animals previously slaughtered, and thereafter, during said month of April, to be slaughtered by defendant in the course of his business of butcher. Plaintiff then paid to defendant the sum of two hundred dollars, and took the following receipt: "Received from M. Herzog two hundred dollars on account. All hides and pelts, April killing, to be delivered on or about May 1, 1895. J. S. Purdy.” By the terms of the contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Young & Conant Manufacturing Co. v. WakefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- More v. BonnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Howe v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Hanson v. SlavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Bamberger Bros. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.