Cornwell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUONGO, District Judge.
David and Donna Cornwell, the plaintiffs in this diversity action, seek a declaration that the defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm), is, by virtue of the homeowners insurance policy issued by it, obligated to defend plaintiffs in a civil action pending in state court. The parties agree that there is an exclusion, clearly and unambiguously stated in the policy, under the terms of which State Farm has no duty to defend the state court action. Nevertheless, the plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment maintaining that under Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hionis v. Northern Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Brokers Title Company, Inc., and the Title Guarantee Company v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, and the Title Guarantee CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Kelmo Enterprises, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Miller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Jersey Bank v. CS Associates (In Re CS Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Judge v. Burnhope (In Re Leedy Mortgage Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Selected Risks Insurance v. BrunoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Allstate Insurance v. Fodor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2000