Legal Opinion

Wray v. Fry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1902No. 19,676PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Hancock Circuit Court; J. E. McCullough, Special Judge. Action by James W. Fry and others against Samuel W. Wray to enforce the lien of a sewer assessment. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellees brought this action in November, 1899, to enforce the lien of an assessment for the construction of a sewer, under the act of 1895, Acts 1895, pp. 190-192, being §§3597a-3597c Burns 1901. A trial of the cause resulted in a finding for appellees and a judgment *94thereon enforcing said lien. The errors, assigned, and not waived, call in question the sufficiency of the complaint, the action of the court in sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s answer, and in sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s cross-complaint.

It is insisted by appellant that the statute under which said sewer was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Blue v. Capital National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Shake v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Leeds v. DefreesIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Garrett v. Bissell Chilled Plow WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. NorcrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Johnson v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Brown v. Central Bermudez Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Voris v. Pittsburg Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TaberIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API