Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Bissell Chilled Plow Works

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1900No. 18,750PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From tlie St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee on demurrer to appellant’s complaint for libel.

- The complaint was in two paragraphs, which were substantially the same, and predicated upon the following letter: “Office of Bissell Chilled Plow 'Works, South Bend, Ind., May 15, 1897. Mr. M. J. Bufanger, Granger, Ind. Dear Sir: The plow that Mr. Garrett used is ours, and if you will deliver it to E. F. Rhoades he will try and sell it for us, or if you can sell it for $30 we will give you $5 for selling it. If you will send us a draft for $25 you may have the plow. Truly yours, Bissell…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wayne Pike Co. v. HammonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Seller v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Palmer v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ward v. ColyhanIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Hays v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. MottIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wray v. FryIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Davis v. NeighborsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Indiana Board of PharmacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Jacobs v. City of Columbus ex rel. Police DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API