Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Taber

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1906No. 20,580PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Erom White Circuit Court; Truman F. Palmer, Judge. Action by Oliver P. Taber against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action, for work done by appellee in the improvement of certain streets, was brought to collect assessments of benefits made against real estate owned by appellant in fee simple and used by it as a railroad right of way and for freight and passenger depot grounds in the town of Remington. The proceedings for the improvement were under §4288 ei seq. Bums 1901, known as the Barrett law. A trial of said cause resulted in a special finding of facts, conclusions of law thereon, and' final judgment in personam against appellant for said assessments, with six per cent interest and attorneys’…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. ChowningTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' Insurance v. DobneySupreme Court of the United States · 1903

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mak-Saw-Ba Club v. CoffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Brownell Improvement Co. v. NixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Martindale v. Town of RochesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Zorn v. Warren-Scharf Asphalt Paving Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Engebretson v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API