Caudle v. . Caudle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Justice, J., at January Term, 1912, of StaNly. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Tbe testator devised to bis daughter Sarab “60 acres of land”; to bis daughter Eliza “40 acres”; to bis daughter Henrietta “40 acres”; to bis son S. J. “125 acres”; to . bis son R. E. “82 acres,” tbe latter to include “tbe old borne place where I now live.” It was admitted in tbe trial below that tbe testator died seized and possessed of 347 acres of land.
Tbe plaintiffs are tbe other heirs of tbe testator, who have brought this proceeding against tbe devisees above named, alleging that tbe testator left 347 acres of land, and asking for a partition of tbe same among themselves and tbe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ward v. Gay.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Harvey v. . Harvey .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Wright v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Jones v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stockard v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Stephenson v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Burchett v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Boddie v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Stephenson v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984