Legal Opinion

Stockard v. . Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Connor, J., at September Term, 1917, of AiAMANOE.

1Opinion of the CourtClare, C. J.

Tbis was a proceeding by the heirs at law of T. B. "Warren to sell the tract of land set out in the petition for partition, making R. E. Warren and wife defendants, who allege that he was sole owner because the intestate had entered into a contract in writing with him to move upon his land and take charge of the farming operations upon an agreement that T. B. Warren would devise absolutely to the defendant R. E. Warren the tract of land described in the petition. Said Y. B. Warren died intestate after his wife and the defendant R. E. Warren averred that the plaintiffs held the land as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Earnhardt v. Clement.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Price v. Price.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Fulwood v. . FulwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Falls of Neuse Manufacturing Co. v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Boddie v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ladd v. Estate of KellenbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Schoolfield v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Ledingham v. BaylessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Fawcett v. . FawcettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API