Legal Opinion

Davis v. United States Sentencing Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 21, 2011No. Civil Action 11-1433 (UNA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the court to dismiss an action “at any time” it determines that subject matter jurisdiction is wanting).

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the McKean Federal Correctional Institution in Bradford, Pennsylvania. He sues the United States Sentencing Commission under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Cuthbert O. Simpkins v. District of Columbia GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. Tooley v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  2. Buchsbaum v. Digital Intelligence Systems, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API