Van Den Heuval v. Wallace
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The issue in this appeal concerns the right of a workmen’s compensation insurance carrier, who paid benefits in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Delaware, to intervene in an employee’s third party tort action in Pennsylvania. The trial court held that the carrier had no right of subrogation, even though such a right was expressly granted by Delaware law, and denied the carrier’s petition to intervene. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we reverse.
Jacob Van Den Heuval, a resident of Maryland, was employed by Breeding & Day, Inc., a Delaware corporation having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. East Stroudsburg Savings Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Maginley v. Robert J. Elliott, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Donald Goodemote v. Mushroom Transportation Company, Inc. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sandra Carrick, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael J. Carrick, Deceased v. Zurich-American Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Cupples Farms Partnership v. Forrest City Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Allstate Insurance v. McFaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- PMA Insurance Group v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Davish v. GidleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.