Legal Opinion

Dallal v. Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J), dated June 7, 2007, which denied its motion pursuant to CFLR 3212 for leave to serve and file a late motion for summary judgment and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Fursuant to rule 13 of the Uniform Civil Term Rules of the Supreme Court, Kings County, the defendant was required to make its motion for summary judgment no more than 60 days after the note of issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Breiding v. GiladiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Pierre v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API