Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied.
Barely five months ago, in Brill v City of New York (2 NY3d 648 [2004]), this Court reversed an award of summary judgment for defendant, without considering its merit, on the ground that the motion, made more than 120 days after note of issue was filed, failed to comply with the statutory requirement that “good cause” be shown for the late filing. We determined that, if the merit of the motion itself constituted good cause, the statutory deadline…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by121 opinions
- Gibbs v. St. Barnabas HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Grande v. PeteroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Cadichon v. FacelleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Filannino v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.