Legal Opinion

Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2004PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied.

Barely five months ago, in Brill v City of New York (2 NY3d 648 [2004]), this Court reversed an award of summary judgment for defendant, without considering its merit, on the ground that the motion, made more than 120 days after note of issue was filed, failed to comply with the statutory requirement that “good cause” be shown for the late filing. We determined that, if the merit of the motion itself constituted good cause, the statutory deadline…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. St. Barnabas HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Grande v. PeteroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Cadichon v. FacelleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Filannino v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API