Legal Opinion
Pierre v. Feldman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Pavel Feldman appeals, as limited by his brief, , from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J), dated April 12, 2006, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3212 for leave to serve and file a late motion for summary judgment, and summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
*455Pursuant to rule 13 of the Uniform Civil Term Rules of the Supreme Court, Kings County, the appellant was required to make his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Breiding v. GiladiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simpson v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Lyebyedyev v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Dallal v. Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008