Legal Opinion

Sellent-Repent Corp. v. Queens Borough Gas & Electric Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeoweb, J.

This is a motion to cancel a notice of pendency of this action and to dismiss the complaint as against the moving defendant. Plaintiff is a domestic corporation and is not represented in this action by an attorney at law, the summons and complaint being subscribed in its corporate name as appearing in person. The sole ground on which movant relies on this motion is that a corporation cannot prosecute or defend an action in person, but must appear by an attorney duly licensed to practice.

The question seems not to have been passed upon in this State. A. B. C. Steel Equipment Co., Inc., v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DakinNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. La Farge v. . Exchange Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. A. B. C. Steel Equipment Co. v. A. H. Schreiber Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Brandstein v. White Lamps, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  4. Haverty Furniture Co. v. FoustTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mortgage Commission v. Great Neck Improvement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API