Legal Opinion

Mortgage Commission v. Great Neck Improvement Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1937PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

In this action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the defendant Great Neck Improvement Company, a domestic corporation, served a notice of appearance and an answer containing an affirmative defense, subscribed in its corporate name, as appearing in person. The plaintiffs now move for an order striking out this answer upon the sole ground that a corporation cannot defend an action in person but must appear by a duly licensed attorney.

The question thus presented seems to have been passed upon by the courts of this State for the first time in the case of Sellent-Repent Corporation v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Culpeper National Bank, Inc. v. Tidewater Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  4. Bennie v. Triangle Ranch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. New Jersey Photo Engraving Co. v. Carl Schonert & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Judd v. City Trust & Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Brandstein v. White Lamps, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  5. Strong Delivery Ministry Ass'n v. Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API