Legal Opinion

Franco v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 25, 1981No. 1 CA-IC 2372PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Presiding Judge.

The issue raised in this Industrial Commission special action is whether a voluntary retirement of an injured workmen’s compensation claimant is grounds for a readjustment of his loss of earning capacity benefits. We hold that it is not, and set aside the award.

The petitioner, Mike Franco, suffered a back injury in 1969 when he was unloading produce at work. At the time of his injury, Mr. Franco was earning $620.24 per month. In 1971, the Industrial Commission determined that the claimant had an unscheduled permanent partial disability representing a 15%…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BrophyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Smith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wiedmaier v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of Wisconsin v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  2. Shiek v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Felker v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Doles v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. OverdorffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API