Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal by allowance from the judgment of the superior court reversing the trial court’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) in favor of appellants, Rohm & Haas. In this case involving comprehensive general liability coverage (CGL)1 for the cleanup of serious environmental pollution of the soil, groundwater and surface water of a manufacturing site formerly owned and operated by appellants, appellants present three issues for this court’s review. The first issue is whether JNOV was properly entered…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Betz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. KitchenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania American Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.