Legal Opinion

Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2001No. 7 and 8 E.D. Appeal Docket 2000PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal by allowance from the judgment of the superior court reversing the trial court’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) in favor of appellants, Rohm & Haas. In this case involving comprehensive general liability coverage (CGL)1 for the cleanup of serious environmental pollution of the soil, groundwater and surface water of a manufacturing site formerly owned and operated by appellants, appellants present three issues for this court’s review. The first issue is whether JNOV was properly entered…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Broxie v. Household Finance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Betz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. KitchenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania American Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API