Legal Opinion

People v. Pease

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 1997No. 96SA467PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

This is an interlocutory appeal of the district court’s order suppressing statements of the defendant, Jeffrey Pease, pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1. The district court suppressed Pease’s statements from use at trial because the police deliberately faded to tell Pease that they had a warrant for his arrest. We reverse and hold that Pease’s waiver of Mi randa 1 rights was valid even though the police deliberately failed to tell Pease that there was a warrant for his arrest.

I

In September 1994, Colorado Springs Police Detective Richard Hunt obtained information concerning Pease’s alleged sexual activity…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. MadridSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. People v. HumphreySupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. People v. Mejia-MendozaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co. v. KingColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API