People v. Mejia-Mendoza
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
The People bring this interlocutory appeal to challenge the trial court’s order suppressing statements made to police by the defendant, Jose Alfredo Mejia-Mendoza. The trial court ruled that, although Mejia-Mendoza voluntarily waived his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), he did not do so knowingly and intelligently. The basis for the suppression order was that the People failed to prove that Mejia-Mendoza understood his rights under Miranda. Applying the totality of the circumstances test, we hold that the record supports the trial court’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- People v. QuezadaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. Al-YousifColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. HumphreySupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Nicholas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. Preciado-FloresColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.