Legal Opinion

Boenke v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1936No. 5114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION,By TATGENHORST, PJ.

This case is presented on appeal on questions of law from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

The petition alleges the appellee, a police officer, was operating an auto patrol on the afternoon of July 20, 1932 southwardly on Plum Street, towards Fourth Street, in the city of Cincinnati, on an emergency call, operating the siren on said auto patrol eonstantly and loudly; that the appellant was operating one of its one-man street cars westwardly on Fourth Street, in charge of a motorman; that as said street car approached Plum Street, a bystander stepped into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michalsky v. GaertnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Curtis v. HubbelOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Cincinnati St. Ry. Co. v. BartschOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Thomas v. CsonkaOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saeger v. Canton City Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API