Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Hubbel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1932No. 247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In these proceedings in error it is sought to reverse a judgment of the court of common pleas of Sandusky county rendered in favor of Morris Hubbel, the defendant in error. The action in the court of common pleas was commenced by Lena Curtis to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision between an automobile driven by Mrs. Schachtler, in which Mrs. Curtis was riding as a guest, and an automobile owned and operated by Hubbel.

The collision occurred at about 7:30 o'clock in the evening of January 18, 1931, on state route No. 102, also known as the Woodville road, and at a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowmaster v. William H. DePree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Burkhart v. CornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Gibson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Difederico v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. SkinnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API