Legal Opinion

Michalsky v. Gaertner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1935No. 2532PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WASHBURN, J.

The record discloses that the plaintiff, at the time and before the accident, was sickly, that he was behind in his school work, that he was slow mentally and also in his physical movements, and that he was 9 years of age and rather small for a boy of his ago.

The evidence, as shown b^ the record, is such as to fully justify the conclusion that a part of the defendant’s car was on the left, or east, side of the center of the street, and that plaintiff was struck just as he was passing the left end of defendant’s bumper, and that plaintiff’s body came to rest within a few…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pletcter v. BodleOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Thomas v. HeerOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Karras v. MosleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Thompson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. BowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Lones v. Detroit, Toledo And Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Alvarez v. HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. Herrell v. PimslerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
  5. Karr v. McNeilOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API