Legal Opinion

Saeger v. Canton City Lines, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1946No. 2218PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiffs, appellants herein, brought an action in the Court of Common Pleas against the defendant Canton City Lines, Inc', appellee herein, and one Ernest Guess for property damage sustained to an automobile belonging to the plaintiff Saeger. In the petition there were various specifications of negligence against both defendants and the claim was made in the petition that the damage sustained by the plaintiff Saeger was caused directly and proximately by tbe joint and concurrent negligence of the defendants in the respects set forth.

There was no substantial dispute of facts and no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Casey v. SicilianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Montgomery v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. LindahlOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. OrwigOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Boenke v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sandberg v. SpoelstraWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Stine v. Springfield City Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Eshelman v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Karen Cornish-Adebiyi v. Caesars Entertainment IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API