Legal Opinion
Wilkinson v. Rodgers
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided March 17, 2023No. 1:23-cv-03035Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 RICHARD S. WILKINSON, et al., NO. 1:23-CV-3035-TOR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 v. MOTION TO EXPEDITE AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 10 SCOTT RODGERS, et al., FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 11 Defendants. 12 13 BEFORE THE COURT are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining 14 Order (ECF No. 4) and Motion to Expedite the same (ECF No. 3). This matter was 15 submitted for consideration without oral argument. The Court has reviewed the 16 record and files herein and is fully informed. For the reasons…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.