Legal Opinion

Sheldon v. Mull

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1885No. 9685PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

Ejectment to recover a strip of land.

The jury rendered the following verdict: —

“ We, the jury in the above-entitled cause, find for the defendant, on the ground that he has not had possession of any of the land sued for.”

Plaintiff and defendant were adjoining owners of land.

In December, 1881, defendant constructed a fence, apparently as and for a line fence between himself and plaintiff, but which was not on the line, being over on plaintiff’s land, and leaving a narrow strip thereof on defendant’s side.

*300The fence did not make an enclosure, extending only a portion of the way along…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Suñol v. HepburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  2. McCreery v. EverdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Sheehy v. TrueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bullock v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Sibley v. JeffreysArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gildehaus v. WhitingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API